The woman involved in the incident, whose identity has not been disclosed, has provided conflicting statements about what transpired. Initially, she described the encounter as emotionally charged but denied any physical abuse, attributing visible bruises to pre-existing medical conditions and activities from a recent trip abroad. However, police reports obtained by News4 suggest a more complex narrative. One report alleges that Mills, identified as the woman’s significant other, physically pushed her during the altercation, resulting in fresh bruises. The report also claims that Mills instructed the woman to lie about the origin of her injuries during a phone call overheard by responding officers. Despite these allegations, the woman later recanted her initial account, complicating the investigation.
The Metropolitan Police Department has faced criticism for its handling of the case, particularly for not making an arrest despite evidence suggesting probable cause. D.C. law mandates that officers arrest individuals if there is reasonable belief that an intrafamily offense resulting in physical injury has occurred. However, the incident was initially classified as a family disturbance rather than an assault, leading to questions about whether proper protocols were followed. In response, the department has launched an internal investigation to review its actions and ensure compliance with established policies. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has also weighed in, emphasizing the importance of accountability and transparency in the ongoing review.
As the investigation unfolds, additional details have emerged, further complicating the case. News4 obtained multiple versions of the police report, each offering varying accounts of the incident. One version describes a physical altercation severe enough to cause bruising, while another downplays the event as a routine family dispute. The inconsistencies have prompted scrutiny from both law enforcement and the public, with many questioning the integrity of the initial response. Meanwhile, Mills has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, expressing confidence that the investigation will exonerate him. His office has characterized the incident as a private matter that was unnecessarily escalated, though they have declined to provide further comment on recent developments.
The case has broader implications, not only for Mills’ political career but also for public trust in law enforcement. As a two-term congressman with aspirations for higher office, Mills’ involvement in such a high-profile investigation could have lasting repercussions. Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Police Department’s internal review highlights the challenges of handling sensitive cases involving public figures. With the investigation still ongoing, it remains unclear whether charges will be filed or if the case will be resolved without further legal action. As the story continues to develop, it serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding allegations of misconduct and the importance of thorough, impartial investigations in maintaining public confidence.