The Scottish Football Association’s Key Match Incident (KMI) panel has issued its final assessments on three contentious penalty decisions from Boxing Day matches, shedding light on incidents involving Celtic and Rangers. These decisions have fueled debates among fans, managers, and former referees, with the panel providing detailed explanations to clarify their reasoning.
In the Rangers vs. St Mirren fixture, the panel unanimously upheld referee David Dickinson’s decision to award a penalty against Rangers’ goalkeeper Jack Butland for his foul on Greg Killie. While some called for a red card, the panel agreed that a yellow card was appropriate, labeling the challenge as reckless rather than excessive. Oisin Smyth converted the penalty to give St Mirren the lead, and despite an equalizer from Danilo, Caolan Boyd-Munce’s decisive goal secured St Mirren’s first league victory over Rangers since 2011.
Celtic’s dominant 4-0 win over Motherwell featured two debated penalty scenarios. The first occurred when Kofi Balmer appeared to handle the ball while blocking a cross from Paulo Bernardo. VAR reviewed the incident but upheld the on-field decision of no handball. While the majority of the KMI panel (4:1) supported this outcome, one member believed the referee should have consulted the pitchside monitor for further evaluation.
The second incident arose during first-half stoppage time when Celtic’s Hyun-Jun Yang was brought down in the box by Motherwell goalkeeper Aston Oxborough. Referee Ross Hardie awarded a penalty, which the KMI panel unanimously supported. The panel concluded that the decision was not one for VAR intervention, as it did not meet the threshold for a clear and obvious error.
Motherwell manager Stuart Kettlewell, however, voiced his discontent, describing the penalty as “soft” and questioning the level of contact involved. His comments reflect the broader debate surrounding the consistency of refereeing decisions, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability in the officiating process.
These reviews from the KMI panel aim to provide clarity and reinforce the credibility of refereeing decisions, even as discussions about fairness and accuracy continue to dominate the Scottish football na
rrative.